Thursday, December 17, 2009

Take Home Final Exam



The individual aspects and ideas of the “home” and “work” space are evolving and shifting as long distance travel becomes something of the past. Tourism and travel were once something done on leisure time, occurring somewhere between where the home and work meet. In today’s ever changing world and economy a worker no longer has to travel great distances around his or her environment in order to make a living. In the case studies of “Les Olypiades” and the city of Elche’s booming shoe industry the home becomes a place of work and the two intertwine themselves to one and other.



This mixture of residential and commercial industry has created a hybrid identity of migrants and natives a like. For example, the building in Paris, France, which was created to house hundreds, has become a melting pot of Chinese culture as more and more immigrants flock to the area. The Dubalin article goes on to state: “the Asiatic community realized the possibility that they could manage a plurality of functions in complete freedom…”(Dubalin, 82). The building itself has become divided into sectors of living including the residential home, restaurants, workshops, and places of religion. In the Elche, Spain article Multiplicity explains, “while [shoe] production had historically been concentrated in a few large industrial buildings, today it is literally dispersed throughout the entire city” (Multiplicity, 151). This blending of home and work, in both Elche’s and the building in Paris’ case has created a counter culture of stay at home workers who live in a blended world of commerce and leisure.



The low-income housing project “Les Olypiades” has been carefully structured to hold a cities worth of infrastructure while maintaining a suitable living style. While the top floors of the building are for residents the “subterranean levels are occupied by larger scale suppliers, warehouses, refrigerated storage facilities, car-parking for delivery vans and general utility installations”(Dubalin, 82). In order to maintain a living space with the addition of larger industries the residents here have created different markets and districts to house the work and imports. The citizens of Elche have also over gone a similar change with the creation of the their footwear district. The change in industry from factory to jobs at home has left a gap for landlords and local shops to take advantage of domestic workers, for this reason the predominant work force are stay at home women. By allowing the shoe industry to conduct their work inside of the home these women have given up their private lives for that of the public in order to pursue a local career.



The city of Elche itself has become a living and breathing industrial plant, as work has literally over taken the households and workers now live within the system. The homes and workshops situated amongst the city have shifted into checkpoints along the assembly line of a production factory. As opposed to any other local ingredient found on the streets the only found consistently within Elche anymore are the bags full of shoes. The concrete monster of “Les Olypiades” has come to life as a fluctuating and breathing city on the rise as business and entrepreneurs have a chance to combine the work force with the domestic duties in life. Together these two cases of Elche and Paris have become perfect examples of the changes in the “home” and “work” scenario as the two blends to create a hybrid model of life.




Bibliography

Dubalin, Y. et. al. “A City in a Building: Paris Subversions.” USE: Uncertain States
of Europe. Ed. Susan Wise. Milan: Skira Editore S.p.a., 2003 80-87


Multiplicity. “House Factories: Elche Disseminations.” USE: Uncertain States of
Europe. Ed. Susan Wise. Milan: Skira Editore S.p.a., 2003. 150-157

Thursday, December 3, 2009



Sin Nombre and the Border

Sin Nombre, or “Nameless” is a look into the struggles Mexican immigrants face while trying to migrate north, past the border into the United States. During research for the film director Cary Joji Fukunaga discovered that many migrants not only face deportation and injustice from border patrol but also exploitation from local gangs. The MS13 gang is considered a “nation” with deep ties in both Mexico and the US. The border has become something uncontrollable, split down the middle yet covered in hostile gang territory and crime. Sin Nombre dives into the harsh reality of being a duel citizen in Mexico while living as part of the MS13 gang nation.

In the film El Casper, a MS13 member, has just rebelled against the gang by killing its leader Lil’ Mago. Fearing his life and running from the gang members he once called brothers, Casper boards a train headed to the US. While riding he meets Sayra, who was traveling with her father and uncle in hopes of finding their second family who are already in the US. Sayra’s father was accidentally killed and her uncle deported back home. On the journey the two become outcasts as Casper’s gang affiliated past keeps him away from other migrants and Sayra’s entire family slips farther and farther away from her grasp.




On the other side of the Mexican mirror by Guillermo Gomez-Pena duel citizenship is expressed as something powerful with “the ability of imagining a more enlightened future for both countries”(3). The reality of duel citizenship, however, is that it often creates alienation as opposed to unity. Gomez-Pena writes that migrants become “instant traitors, inauthentic and bastardized… the forgotten orphans of the Mexican nation-state”(3). While the article discusses immigrants as being metaphorically marked in society, Casper is literally marked with gang tattoos that keep him distant from everyone else. It’s Sayra’s ability to see the good in Casper that steers her toward his path into the US and away from anyone else on the train.

While on their journey Casper and Sayra constantly hide and run from both the border patrol and the ruthless MS13 members that are hunting them down. By using every possible means of transportation and secrecy the two are able to slip past the obstacles, both natural and man-made, that makes up the Mexico/US border. Although the actual border is never shown in the film each scene deals with the characters overcoming metaphorical and sometimes literal borders in the forms of refugee camps, bridges, and fences or walls



The Border Syndrome work describes the many variations of borders and the ways they change the societies around them. While some are considered “folds” or “sponges” the most interesting and relevant is the “funnel” border. Funnels are described as “boundaries that select and direct flows within a threshold…from one side of the fence to the other ”(1). Even though both parties control the border “delays in the continuity of the flow…filter and segregate some of its elements and give it a direction”(1). As the US becomes less tolerant of illegal immigration the border begins to shut down on one side, leaving the other to fend for itself. The areas around the Mexican border are seen as becoming a hostile no-mans land where only the willing survives. Cultural outcasts flock to the area with hopes of making something out of their lives only to turned down or “filtered” out with the rift raft.

Casper and Sayra manage to make it all the way to a secluded river dividing the US and Mexico. After paying off local crime lords they are granted access to cross the river and finally make it to their destination. As Casper pushes Sayra off into the river and to safety his troubled past catches up with him. MS13 members ambush him and kill Casper before he is able to escape. Heart broken over the death of her new friend, but pushing forward, Sayra is able to make it to a mega mall in the US where she calls her family already living there. The film ends with a sense of closer as Sayra has made it through the many obstacles laid before her and is now able to find a new and better life across the border.



Sin Nombre stands for the nameless bodies that come and go from the borderlands. Fukunaga set out to make a film that expressed those agonies and heartbreaks felt by illegal immigrants that simply want something better for themselves. The film as the ability to show both the positive outcome of opening the border and the tragedies of negative stereotypes that play into keeping it closed. Sin Nombre is a tribute to those who have fought and both won and lost the battle into freedom and happiness, it is a true reminder of the nameless.

Bibliography

Boeri, Stefano. “Border Syndrome : Notes for a Research Program.” Territories: Islands,
Camps, and Other States of Utopia. Ed. Anselm Franke. Berlin: Konig, 2003.

Chataigne, Christophe. “A Journey on the Railroad”. The Socialist Review. July 2009

Gomez-Pena, Guillermo. On the other side of the Mexican Mirror Ethno-Techno:
Writings on performance, activism, and pedagogy. Ed. Elaine Pena. New York and
London: Routledge, 2005.

Johnson, Reed. “Crossing borders with ‘Sin Nombre’”. Los Angeles Times. Mar. 8, 2009

Sin Nombre. Dir. Cary Joji Fukunaga. Prod. Amy Kaufman. Focus Features, 2009


Group Presentations on the Border

Throughout the readings and class discussions covered in this module we have learned that the border is a line or zone in a geographical boundary, which grants control over a territory. Borders help to determine cultural entities and differences while granting legal jurisdictions in specified zones. During the group presentations the border has been seen as a dividing line between the good and evil, a permeable barrier covering natural land features, and a disappearing obstacle in the technological world of tomorrow. In the film Babel, a border is expressed as something both physically and psychologically dividing cultures. As tragedy strikes in all corners of the world characters must come together and over come their hardships. Televisions and telephone communication allow the border to simply disappear as one person can contact another halfway around the globe. The Frozen River takes a look at the permeability of a border, as a woman and her friend become illegal smugglers crossing over the Canada/US border. Human trafficking goes from something taboo in society to a business venture in order to support a family in need. In the distant future universe of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country the border is the only thing protecting evil from good. As the Federation learns of a troubled Klingon ship they must decide whether or not it is morally wrong to ignore the distress calls of an enemy ship. Over the coarse of the film the border becomes a dividing not for good or bad, but simply something that separates cultures and their differences. Young Casper finds out how corrupt the border is as he travels into northern Mexico to cross into the US. Not only must Casper deal with border patrol from both nations but also over come the MS13 “gang nation” as they try to ambush him. The neutral zone near the border leaves an open slot for corrupt gang members to take control of the land. While separating and driving cultures away from each other the border also has the ability to connect and bring societies closer together. When given the opportunity to change nations have the ability to learn and grow stronger together but if left unnoticed the border serves as a thorn in both sides. It ultimately up to the people to determine how the border is presented as a barrier or as a middle ground between cultures.

Friday, October 23, 2009

To Deal or Not to Deal


Howie Mandel might be a Canadian stand-up comedian, but he found his claim to fame by becoming host of the United States version of the hit game show Deal or No Deal “Howie Mandel, 12/19/05, US”. Universal Studios began running the show on NBC in late 2005 and continued airing the program until May of 2009. Deal or No Deal started with a possible $1,000,000 prize won on every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday night. By the second season airing in 2006 the show created a spin off running every weekday flaunting a $500,000 prize on top of the regular scheduled weeknight show times. At the end of the fourth season Deal or No Deal became known as the United States largest selling international game show syndicate to this day.


The original show, Miljoenenjacht was the brainchild of Dick de Rijk, and was hosted by Linda de Mol, created by Dutch production company: Endemol. The game featured contestants, with the help of a studio audience, answering questions and gambling their way through 26 suitcases containing various sums of money. As each suitcase was removed from the bunch so was the corresponding amount of cash in the contestants bank. As the show went on and intensified a mysterious banker would offer differing sums of money as bribes for contestants to forfeit from the game. The combination of luck and whit brought the game show worldwide fame and following.


Since it’s original airdate in the Netherlands in 2000 the show has moved through 6 continents and into the homes in over 60 countries across the globe. Copies like the Korean Yes or No and Mexico’s Vas or No Vas make it hard to tell the difference. According to the Michael Keane and Albert Moran reading Television’s New Engines this media franchise has become a perfect example of these “new engines”. Keane and Moran explain the show as “a finished creative product accessible to audiences in more than one national market”(2), as you can see from the three available You Tube clips. No matter where in the world the show happens to air it follows the same paradigm of gambling with tools of elimination and help through family and friends to over come the odds and win prize money.


This game show is programmed to run all over the world, bringing in fans through its generic suspense and reward drive, yet it has the ability to bring individual unity to each country. International sensation Deal or No Deal has become what writer Arjun Appadurai would call a mediascape. It has the ability to convey international production and release of “the images of the world created by these media outlets” (1). While creating a global phenomenon and understanding the game show has also allowed countries to bond as households tune in to follow the risk and reward system played out on their television sets. A simple combination of randomness and whit has blasted its way into history as the most common syndicate in the world. People everywhere are coming together to support their fellow patriot choose to “deal or no deal”.



End Notes

Appadurai, Arjun. “Here and Now.” Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of

Globalization. 1996. Public Worlds Series. Eds. Dilip Goankar and Benjamin Lee. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2008


Keane, Michael and Albert, Moran. “Television’s New Engines.” Television and New Media. 9.2, 2008


http://www.dealornodeal.com/history


http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Deal_or_No_Deal_-_International_versions/id/4975007


Video Links

Unlucky Contestant (Australia)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEOL0CtQR4I&feature=related


Interviewed Contestant (UK)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnVMcik_uJY


Million Dollar Winner (US)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfDaplU9zuw


Image Still

http://www.endemol.com/images/images/deal-or-no-deal.jpg